Episode 105: "Rent" (SPOILERS!)

Here are my reactions to Episode 105 of the OUTLANDER TV series, titled "Rent".


There are SPOILERS below! If you don't want to know yet, stop reading now.









Interesting opening shot with the horses' hooves. And what a breathtaking view of the scenery to open the episode! I like Claire's coat, too -- very striking.

I had never heard the John Donne poem before, but it's appropriate.
ABSENCE, hear thou my protestation
Against thy strength,
Distance and length:
Do what thou canst for alteration,
For hearts of truest mettle
Absence doth join and Time doth settle.
Bill Patterson seems perfectly cast as Ned Gowan. He's totally convincing, and I liked him immediately. I didn't expect the asthma, but I laughed at the (inadvertent, I'm sure!) connection to Hal's problems in MOHB. I was half-expecting Claire to prescribe joint-fir boiled in coffee. <g>

I really enjoyed the "Maid Gaed to the Mill" song, which I included in my Friday Fun Facts in April 2013. There's a video of the song here if you're interested.

You can really feel Claire's loneliness and isolation. But I love Jamie's comment, "Maybe Angus hates ye. He hates everyone." And the way Jamie smiles at her makes me melt! <g>

I love the details of the rent-collecting, the crofts, the livestock, the tenants (both the way they look and how they are dressed), etc. Seeing how the ordinary people lived really makes the 18th century come alive before my eyes, in a way that the scenes in the castle did not, and I think it's fascinating.

The wool-waulking scene is terrific! I like the fact that all the women's faces, especially the older ones, look like they've had hard lives with plenty of hard work, in contrast to Claire with her perfect skin.

Angus really surprised me in the scene where he drags Claire out of the wool-waulking, since we've only seen him as comic relief up to this point. He's becoming a more realistic, fully-fleshed-out character, and I think that's good. "She's slippery as an eel" -- good line! I also liked the way Claire reacted in this scene, untying the goat, etc. I think it's very much in character, even though it's not in the book.

Watching this episode the first time, I didn't realize the young man (later identifiied as Jeremy Foster) was an Englishman until I saw the red coat. But it definitely explains the clansmen's hostility toward him!

When Dougal ripped Jamie's shirt the first time, I actually yelled at the TV, "Hey, cut that out!!" I felt awful for Jamie, and you can tell Claire does, too.

"I'm not bloody doing it. The lad can wear rags from now on." Cold as ice, and Jamie's reaction is just as I always imagined from the book.

I love watching Dougal in this episode, btw. He's just mesmerizing, more so even than Jamie. <g>

I liked the "black pudding" scene - good to see Claire with her hair loose once in a while, and this exchange between Ned and Claire is great:

"It's a pity they don't allow women to practice law."
"Not yet."
"It'll be a few centuries before that happens."
"Only two."

Again, the scenery is just magnificent!

"Would I have to reconcile myself to live the rest of my life among strangers, two hundred years in the past?" As much as I feel for what she's going through, part of me is saying, "Oh, it's not that bad, you'll see!" LOL.

Notice that the instant "The Watch" is mentioned, Jamie takes off, without a word to anyone.

Claire: "I don't sit with thieves."
Angus: "I will not be judged by an English whore!"

I like how Jamie comes to her defense here, towering over Angus, and making him back down without ever raising his voice or laying a finger on Angus. Just the implied threat is enough.

"Todger" is a new word to me. <g>

I liked the exchange between Claire and Jamie here:

"Angus can kiss my English arse!"
"You're not to judge things ye don't understand." (But she does, constantly; she can't help it.)

I like the stone building in the next village very much. And the bit with Torcall was very good, showing that Dougal does have some humanity after all.

"Christ, I'd die in my blood...." - it's good that we're back to the book, if only briefly.

I like the flashback scene with Frank and the Reverend. Claire's recitation of the historical facts made me laugh -- she has a good memory! Interesting use of the series theme music here, a vivid reminder of the original lyrics of that song, which are all about the aftermath of Culloden.

I was really disappointed that the first part of the scene with Jamie and Dougal is so hard to hear! I wanted very much to see that, but I could barely make out what they were saying. How are viewers who don't know the book supposed to understand what's going on there if they can't hear what the characters are saying?

It got much easier to hear toward the end (the close-up shots are very good) but I really didn't like the fact that they changed the bit about kicking trees from the way it's done in the book. In the book, Claire's saying, "You need to hit something", and more important, Jamie actually taking her advice and finding it sound <g>, is a small step in the evolution of their relationship. It's missing here, and I think that's a shame.

Also, the way they've changed the timing of this scene from the book means that Claire's line, "He'll do that again" makes no sense in context. Of course they both know Dougal will do it again! He's done it a few times already by the time we see them here.

On the bright side, I just love the look that passes between Jamie and Claire when he says, "As ye ken well."

More gorgeous scenery. The tourist industry in Scotland is going to get a huge boost from this episode, I think. <g>

The scene with the executed men was chilling. I wonder if that's historically accurate?

I liked Dougal's speech in the next scene, angry and defiant, even if I don't understand a word he's saying. <g>

And all of a sudden, we're back to the book! <g> The scene with Jamie and Claire in the room at the inn is exactly as I've always pictured it, except that I can't figure out why Claire is still fully dressed, rather than in her shift. Wasn't she asleep when she heard the door creaking? (This is a minor point.)

Sam absolutely NAILED Jamie's trademark "one side of his mouth quirked up in a half-smile" expression. <g> I love it!

I liked the scene with Ned and Claire. "Fighting hearts don't stand a chance against cannons" - good line.

Interesting that it's Angus who starts the fight. In the earlier scene with Jamie and Claire by the campfire, he's the one calling Claire a whore, and now he ends up defending her honor against the very same insult. Very clever bit of writing there, and it works in the context of the TV series, where the focus is mainly on Claire's situation, but I think something important has been lost by the way it's portrayed here.

In the book, the big fight scene in the tavern is started when Jamie finally has had enough and fights back against the insults of the villagers -- and his victory in that fight both earns the respect of the others AND puts an immediate stop to Dougal's using him that way. In the TV-series version of the scene, Jamie isn't even present during the fight (having excused himself early on to go tend the horses). So we don't see Jamie standing up for himself or putting an end to Dougal's public humiliation of him.

On the one hand, I can understand this: Jamie has been through so much (physically) already in the series that showing him being beat up for the third time in 5 episodes might be just too much for TV viewers to take.

On the other hand, since we never get to see Jamie standing up for himself, fighting back, the impression you get is that Jamie will put up with this treatment from Dougal forever. That makes him look weaker and less confident than the Jamie we know from the book, and I didn't care for it.

I did like the fact that after the fight, Claire seems more relaxed, and even teases Rupert a bit. That bit was hilarious! <g>

The views of Culloden were very sobering. I like the way they used the flashback to have Frank give the viewers the historical background.

The Clan MacKenzie stone made me smile. Yes, it's in the books (Roger mentions it in DRAGONFLY IN AMBER), but when I visited Culloden in 2012, I made a point of asking our tour guide if there was a MacKenzie stone somewhere, and he said no. So just keep in mind that the one we see here in this scene is fictional.

That got me thinking: if there is a MacKenzie clan stone at Culloden, who is buried under it? Dougal? As far as we know, there were no other MacKenzie fatalities at Culloden, right? (Just speculation, but it's interesting to think about.)

Interesting that the rest of the clansmen are willing to trust Claire a bit more now, give her more freedom of movement, but Dougal obviously still doesn't trust her at all. Maybe less now than he ever has.

I didn't expect the arrival of the English soldiers at all. Hope Jamie managed to hide before they spotted him!

"Tell me, Madam, are you here by your own choice?" Wow, talk about a cliffhanger! <g>

Overall, I thought this episode was quite enjoyable, and whoever called it a "love letter to Scotland" is absolutely right.

I hope you enjoyed this recap. You can see all my OUTLANDER episode recaps here.

Please come back next week for my recap of Episode 106!


Kerry d said...

Great recap, as always, Karen. I was thrilled with the landscape and scenery, and I really liked how they put the wool walking scene in here. But the scene I missed was when Jamie was showing off his fighting skills to Claire after the confrontation with Dougal. It was another step establishing her physical attraction to him, and we viewers would have enjoyed it very much, I think!

Unknown said...

I was disappointed in the first tavern scene. Dougal made his speech, Jamie left in a huff and Claire stood glaring at Dougal. I really thought "Ok, Claire give it to him". This is where she should have accused him of Jacobite doings. This is where (in the book) Dougal accused her of knowing the garlic when she really didn't. Claire then tells him it wasn't difficult because of the reference to king James. Well, this didn't happen. There was great potential for a showdown between them. I think they dropped the ball. Instead we had to watch Claire struggle with supposition for a few scenes.

leaves on the Raney Tree said...

You're right, Karen. No MacKenzie stone at Culloden. I looked through my photos and it isn't there. Would have fooled me, though, if you hadn't mentioned it. It will be interesting to see what Ron Moore says in his podcast about cutting scenes. There's a scene with Jamie in the background on a wagon, balancing his dagger on the palm of his hand. I think they're showing him as somewhat immature - but isn't that a sham on Jamie's part so as not to make Dougal feel challenged?

Anonymous said...

I love reading your observations. Although I've read the series twice, I do sometimes forget the order of events or some of the details. It's nice that you mention when the TV series differs from the book. I am enjoying the TV series but I ultimately want to keep my memory of the book straight, since the book series has not concluded yet.

Anonymous said...

You said "I was really disappointed that the first part of the scene with Jamie and Dougal is so hard to hear! I wanted very much to see that, but I could barely make out what they were saying. How are viewers who don't know the book supposed to understand what's going on there if they can't hear what the characters are saying?"

I couldn't agree more!! My hubby and I do not have hearing impairments but we watch the series with CC (closed captioning) on. That's the ONLY way I picked up what was being said between Jamie and Dougal in that important scene. It also helps me understand some of the thicker accents.

Anonymous said...

Yes indeed, Anonymous! CC is the best way to watch so one doesn't miss a single detail. I was incredulous at that scene as well--there was no way one could have made out the dialogue unless the volume was jacked.

Anonymous said...

I bought hearing aids (probably really needed them) specifically for this series and I still have a hard time hearing the dialogue!@

islandgirl said...

I'm a big fan of Diana's books( of course, or I wouldn't be reading your blog) which is wonderful, by the way!
My thoughts on the TV series are these: The scenery is spectacular, the set, props and costumes are equally spectacular. The acting is great as well. Claire, Dougal, Mrs, Fitz, everyone, actually, is perfect for their parts. I'm just very disappointed with Jaime's part up to this point. I'm just not falling in love with him as I had by this point in Outlander, the book. His character, so far, lacks many of the attributes which for many reasons makes him my all time favorite fictional hero.

Etta Mae said...

I'm spoiled rotten from having started series like "Breaking Bad" and "Game of Thrones" several years into the series, so I could watch marathon episodes. Not so with this one, and it pains me to wait a week for the next episode.

Anyway, I'm also reading the book, and the arrival of the Red Coats at the end of this episode stray pretty far from the events in the book, where it's Dougal who takes Claire to meet with Randall. I hope they don't veer off the road too much with this story line. I can understand changes when there's a good reason, but changing things for apparently no reason upsets me (g).

I love this series. I love the book and plan on reading the whole series. It's so nice to have romance without the gratuitous sex. I hope they leave something to the imagination following the marriage (oops...spoiler).

luvinva said...

I'm in agreement with your review. I did enjoy the episode - the show is definitely getting grittier! I think the one, overall thing that has bothered me is Jamie is beginning to be portrayed as a bit of a wimp, leaving people who have not read the books to wonder why Claire isn't more attracted to Dougal. I sure hope they get that straightened out. I also wondered about the need to change the scene with Claire and Jamie from her telling Jamie to hit something, to Jamie doing it on his own. In most cases where they's strayed from the book, I can see the purpose. Not so much with that scene. I'm with you, it was an important step in Claire and Jamie's evolution, and without it you can see why people are wondering why they ever get together. It will interesting to see why the young British officer is brought in - and now how Claire and Dougal get to meet up with BJR. We'll know in about 5 days!

Lesharon said...

Hi Karen,

Great review as always, very insightful from someone who knows the Outlanderverse(TM) so well. Open question: Did BJR's attempted rape of Claire as seen in episode 1 the same as the book? I don't recall that and I'm really interested to see how Claire's next scenes with him are portrayed given what he clearly intended to do when they first met.

Anonymous said...

As a Scott I just want to point out that they were not fighting the BRITISH. Scots are British, they are citizens of the Briitsh Isles, the British Commonwealth. The Scots were fighting the ENGLISH who are also British. Confusing I know.

Anonymous said...

KP It'a Gaelic not Garlic. And it wasn't a British officer it was an English officer.

Kitty Milloy said...

Karen! Thank you for your Outlandish blog, which I've enjoyed (and learned so much from) for several years.
Should there be a McKenzie stone at Culloden, Dougal would not be there. Not sure which book the scene is in, but Jamie killed Dougal, when the latter was attacking Claire for being a spy. Funny, in a later book, DG has Dougal die another way ... think!
Loved the books forever, and I'm really pleased with what Starz is doing with their interpretation.

shadeseeker said...

Ned is a great character, fully fleshed out and helps the story move along, with great explanations and insight into what is happening. Can he also be a time traveler? Hence, his comment about women lawyers "in two centuries"?

Dougal is drawn to Claire. Look at the instances he saves her or is aware of her presence. I know he doesn't trust her, but it is primarily because he cannot seem to control her. Short of brute force, he knows he cannot. Only Jamie can really perceive what she is about and even then, only to a certain extent. Love the show and the blog!

Anonymous said...

I totally agree with your assessment of the missing fight. That was a huge disappointment.

Also, they changed the line "For now" to "He's my uncle" - as though Jamie has anything like straightforward family loyalty for Dougal. Also, when they had Jamie spit out some worn-out cliche like "there are things worth fighting for" regarding the Stuart cause. We all know that Jamie's feeling regarding the Rising are mixed even before Claire tells him the outcome.

Your review was so validating = thank you!

margaritagirltoronto said...

Love your comments on the episode "Rent" Did anyone else notice the background sounds when Claire and Jamie touched hands as she was giving him the blanket off her bed? It was the same sound we heard when she was visiting the stones at Craigh na Dun.
I totally love this story - am reading DG's books now and watching the show over and over. In Canada we're behind the UK by 3 episodes, and I just can't wait!

Powered by Blogger.